Sunday, January 11, 2026

Helicopter Parents Snapshot and step-by- step guide

 “Helicopter parents” is a term used to describe parents who are overly involved in their children’s lives, often to the point of hovering over them and controlling or managing many aspects of their experiences. The term comes from the idea of a helicopter constantly flying over someone, watching everything closely.

Here are the key points:

  • Over-involvement: They may check on schoolwork, social activities, or personal decisions constantly.

  • Problem-solving for the child: Instead of letting children face challenges or make mistakes, they intervene to “fix” problems.

  • Protectiveness: Their intention is often to keep the child safe or ensure success, but it can prevent the child from becoming independent.

  • Impact on the child: Kids may grow up feeling less confident, struggle with decision-making, or rely too much on others for guidance.

Example: A helicopter parent might call a teacher to argue about a grade instead of letting the child handle it, or choose all of their child’s extracurricular activities.

The rise of helicopter parenting in modern times is linked to a mix of social, cultural, and economic changes. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

  1. Increased competition in education and jobs:

    • Parents worry that if their children don’t get into top schools or secure good jobs, they’ll fall behind.

    • This drives constant monitoring of grades, extracurriculars, and applications.

  2. Smaller family sizes:

    • Many families today have fewer children than in the past, so parents may focus more attention and resources on each child.

    • This can intensify pressure and involvement.

  3. Heightened safety concerns:

    • Media coverage of accidents, kidnappings, and online dangers can make parents more protective.

    • Fear of something “bad” happening encourages constant supervision.

  4. Cultural shift toward intensive parenting:

    • Modern parenting often emphasizes “being the best parent” and maximizing children’s potential.

    • Social media amplifies this, as parents compare themselves to others.

  5. Economic pressures:

    • Rising costs of education, housing, and childcare make parents anxious about their children’s future.

    • This leads to micromanaging choices and opportunities.

  6. Technology enabling oversight:

    • Smartphones, GPS tracking, and social media allow parents to monitor children’s activities more easily than ever.

    • This can create a sense that constant supervision is possible and necessary.

Bottom line: Helicopter parenting often comes from a mix of love, fear, and societal pressure—but it can unintentionally limit children’s independence and resilience.

Helicopter parenting can have several psychological effects on children, often affecting their confidence, independence, and emotional health. Here’s a clear breakdown:

1. Reduced Independence

  • Children may struggle to make decisions on their own because parents step in too quickly.

  • Even simple choices, like picking clothes or solving a minor problem, can feel overwhelming.

  • Effect: They may rely heavily on others for guidance well into adulthood.

2. Lower Self-Confidence

  • Constant parental oversight can send the message: “You can’t handle things by yourself.”

  • Kids may doubt their abilities, feel insecure, or hesitate to try new challenges.

3. Increased Anxiety and Stress

  • Pressure to meet parental expectations—whether in school, sports, or social life—can be stressful.

  • Children may experience fear of failure or constant worry about disappointing parents.

4. Poor Coping Skills

  • If parents always solve problems for them, children don’t develop strategies for handling setbacks.

  • Effect: Difficulty dealing with challenges, setbacks, or conflict later in life.

5. Lower Resilience

  • Resilience comes from learning through mistakes and failures.

  • Helicopter parenting reduces these experiences, making children less adaptable to stress or change.

6. Possible Social Problems

  • Kids may struggle socially if parents intervene too much in friendships or activities.

  • They might have trouble negotiating conflicts or asserting themselves with peers.

In short, while helicopter parents usually mean well, their over-involvement can unintentionally make children less confident, more anxious, and less capable of handling life’s challenges.

Children of helicopter parents can regain independence and build confidence, but it usually requires conscious effort and small, steady steps. Here’s a practical guide:

1. Start Small with Decision-Making

  • Begin by making choices on your own, even minor ones:

    • What to wear, what to eat, how to spend free time.

  • Gradually take on bigger decisions like managing school projects or planning social events.

  • Tip: Reflect on your choices afterward—what went well, what could improve—without needing parental approval.

2. Take Responsibility for Mistakes

  • Stop expecting someone else to fix every problem.

  • When things go wrong, analyze the situation and think: “How can I fix this?” or “What can I learn?”

  • Effect: Builds problem-solving skills and resilience.

3. Set Personal Goals

  • Choose short-term, achievable goals (e.g., complete a project independently, join a club, learn a new skill).

  • Celebrate small successes to boost confidence.

  • Tip: Tracking progress helps show that you’re capable without constant guidance.

4. Gradually Limit Parental Involvement

  • Politely but firmly ask for space in certain areas:

    • “I’d like to handle this assignment on my own first.”

    • “Can I make this decision without advice?”

  • This helps parents step back and allows them to develop autonomy.

5. Practice Problem-Solving Skills

  • When faced with challenges, brainstorm multiple solutions instead of asking for help immediately.

  • Try implementing one solution independently before seeking guidance.

  • Tip: Keep a “solution journal” to track how you handled problems.

6. Build Confidence Through Experience

  • Take on activities that push you slightly out of your comfort zone:

    • Public speaking, sports, creative projects, part-time jobs, volunteering.

  • Success in these areas reinforces self-reliance.

7. Develop Emotional Independence

  • Learn to manage stress, disappointment, and criticism without leaning on parents constantly.

  • Techniques: mindfulness, journaling, talking to peers or mentors, and self-reflection.

8. Seek Support Outside the Family

  • Mentors, teachers, coaches, or friends can provide guidance without hovering.

  • This allows learning from feedback while maintaining autonomy.

Bottom line: The key is gradual exposure to independence combined with reflection and problem-solving. Confidence grows when children experience making decisions, handling mistakes, and achieving goals on their own.

Correlation between helicopter parenting and various outcomes in children, especially in areas like compliance, independence, anxiety, and conflict resolution. Let’s break it down carefully:

1. Compliance

  • How it relates: Children of helicopter parents are often highly compliant because they are used to parental oversight and guidance.

  • Why: Frequent monitoring and intervention teach children to follow rules and expectations strictly—sometimes out of fear of criticism or disappointing parents.

  • Effect:

    • Positive: They may be responsible and rule-abiding.

    • Negative: They may struggle to make independent choices or assert themselves, relying on approval from authority figures rather than internal judgment.

2. Conflict Resolution

  • How it relates: Helicopter parenting can impair conflict resolution skills.

  • Why: Parents often step in to solve disputes—between siblings, friends, or teachers—so children rarely practice negotiating, compromising, or standing up for themselves.

  • Effect:

    • Children may avoid conflict, become passive, or rely on adults to handle disagreements.

    • They may struggle in teamwork, relationships, or professional settings where self-advocacy is required.

3. Independence and Problem-Solving

  • Helicopter parenting reduces opportunities for independent thinking and problem-solving.

  • Children may comply externally but lack internal confidence or resilience when faced with challenges alone.

4. Anxiety and Emotional Effects

  • Over-involvement correlates with higher anxiety levels in children.

  • Because parents intervene to prevent failure or disappointment, children can develop a fear of mistakes, which reinforces compliance but inhibits healthy risk-taking.

Summary Table of Correlation

Child Trait/Skill: Effectt of Helicopter Parenting
ComplianceHigh compliance; may lack self-direction
Conflict ResolutionPoor skills; reliance on adults to mediate
IndependenceReduced; struggles with decision-making
Problem-SolvingUnderdeveloped; limited ability to handle setbacks
Confidence & Self-EsteemLower: fear of failure or criticism
Anxiety / StressHigher, sensitive to pressure and expectations

Bottom line: Helicopter parenting often creates obedient but dependent children who may struggle with independence, conflict resolution, and coping with challenges on their own.

Step-by-step strategy for children (or even young adults) of helicopter parents to develop independence, confidence, and conflict-resolution skills while taking into account attachment style, cognitive filters, power dynamics, and identity shaping. This integrates psychology with practical life skills.

Step 0: Self-Awareness Foundation

Before taking action, the child must understand how helicopter parenting has affected them.

  1. Attachment Style:

    • Identify if they have anxious, avoidant, or secure attachment tendencies.

    • Example: Anxious attachment may make a child seek constant approval; avoidant attachment may make them resist authority too strongly.

  2. Cognitive Filters:

    • Notice internal thought patterns shaped by helicopter parenting:

      • “I can’t do anything without help.”

      • “Mistakes are unacceptable.”

    • Awareness is the first step in changing them.

  3. Power Dynamics:

    • Understand the parent-child power imbalance: parents control resources, decisions, or validation.

    • Recognize where you have autonomy and where influence exists.

  4. Identity Shaping:

    • Reflect on who you are independently of parental expectations: values, interests, goals, and personality traits.

Step 1: Gradual Independence Through Choice

  • Goal: Build confidence and decision-making skills.

  • Method: Start small, increase complexity gradually.

  • Tactics:

    1. Make minor daily decisions independently (clothing, meals, schedules).

    2. Take responsibility for personal tasks (homework, chores) without parental intervention.

    3. Reflect after decisions: “What worked? What could I do differently?”

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Filters: Challenge thoughts like “I’ll fail without help.”

    • Power Dynamics: Reclaim small domains of control.

Step 2: Exposure to Healthy Risk and Failure

  • Goal: Build resilience, reduce fear of failure.

  • Method: Practice facing challenges without immediate parental rescue.

  • Tactics:

    1. Take on projects where mistakes are allowed (art, coding, sports).

    2. Experience natural consequences (e.g., minor missed deadlines).

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Attachment: Strengthen self-soothing and self-reliance.

    • Filters: Reframe mistakes as learning opportunities.

    • Identity: Recognize personal competence apart from parental approval.

Step 3: Develop Conflict-Resolution Skills

  • Goal: Build assertiveness and negotiation skills.

  • Method: Gradually take responsibility for resolving conflicts with peers or siblings.

  • Tactics:

    1. Practice “I” statements: “I feel X when Y happens, and I would like Z.”

    2. Role-play difficult conversations or disagreements.

    3. Gradually involve parents less in disputes, seeking guidance only when needed.

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Power Dynamics: Learn to navigate peer relationships without defaulting to adult intervention.

    • Identity: Clarify personal boundaries and values in interactions.

Step 4: Reframe Compliance and Authority

  • Goal: Build autonomous decision-making while understanding when compliance is healthy.

  • Method: Evaluate requests and rules critically.

  • Tactics:

    1. Ask, “Does this align with my values or goals?”

    2. Practice polite negotiation instead of automatic compliance.

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Filters: Challenge internalized “I must obey to be loved” beliefs.

    • Power Dynamics: Redefine the parent-child relationship as collaborative, not controlling.

Step 5: Identity Shaping and Self-Expression

  • Goal: Strengthen self-concept independent of parental expectations.

  • Method: Engage in personal passions, hobbies, and social networks outside parental influence.

  • Tactics:

    1. Journal personal values and goals.

    2. Explore creative or skill-based projects independently.

    3. Build friendships and mentorships that reinforce autonomy.

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Filters: Counteract “I’m only valuable if I follow rules.”

    • Attachment: Develop secure self-attachment by nurturing self-worth.

    • Power Dynamics: Establish autonomy in decision-making.

Step 6: Gradual Recalibration of Parent-Child Relationship

  • Goal: Shift from helicopter dynamics to supportive collaboration.

  • Method: Communicate clearly, set boundaries, and demonstrate competence.

  • Tactics:

    1. Share successes and mistakes proactively to reduce parental anxiety.

    2. Establish limits: “I appreciate your advice, but I want to try this on my own first.”

    3. Celebrate autonomy milestones with parents to build trust.

  • Psychological Integration:

    • Filters: Reduce guilt from independence.

    • Power Dynamics: Move from control-based to mutual respect.

Key Principles to Remember

  1. Start Small: Independence grows gradually—don’t rush or force it.

  2. Self-Reflection: Regularly assess attachment tendencies, thought filters, and personal values.

  3. Learn by Doing: Real-life experiences teach more than advice.

  4. Boundaries Are Healthy: Autonomy requires setting limits respectfully.

  5. Celebrate Progress: Every decision, failure, or conflict navigated independently builds confidence.

START
  │
  ▼
Step 0: Self-Awareness Foundation
  ├─ Assess Attachment Style (Anxious / Avoidant / Secure)
  ├─ Identify Cognitive Filters (“I can’t do this alone”, “Mistakes = failure”)
  ├─ Recognize Parent-Child Power Dynamics
  └─ Reflect on Personal Identity vs Parental Expectations
  │
  ▼
Step 1: Gradual Independence Through Choice
  ├─ Make daily minor decisions independently
  ├─ Take responsibility for personal tasks
  └─ Reflect on outcomes without seeking parental approval
  └─ Integrates:
        • Filters: Challenge “I can’t succeed alone.”
        • Power: Reclaim small domains of control
        • Identity: Practice self-expression
  │
  ▼
Step 2: Exposure to Healthy Risk and Failure
  ├─ Engage in activities where mistakes are safe (projects, hobbies)
  ├─ Experience natural consequences
  └─ Integrates:
        • Attachment: Strengthen self-reliance
        • Filters: Reframe mistakes as learning
        • Identity: Recognize competence independently
  │
  ▼
Step 3: Develop Conflict-Resolution Skills
  ├─ Practice “I” statements and assertive communication
  ├─ Negotiate peer and sibling conflicts independently
  └─ Integrates:
        • Power: Navigate relationships without adult intervention
        • Identity: Clarify boundaries and personal values
        • Filters: Challenge “I must rely on adults for resolution.”
  │
  ▼
Step 4: Reframe Compliance and Authority
  ├─ Evaluate rules/requests critically
  ├─ Practice polite negotiation instead of automatic obedience
  └─ Integrates:
        • Filters: Counter “I must obey to be loved.”
        • Power: Shift relationship from control to collaboration
        • Identity: Strengthen autonomous decision-making
  │
  ▼
Step 5: Identity Shaping and Self-Expression
  ├─ Explore personal passions and hobbies
  ├─ Journal values, goals, and achievements
  ├─ Build supportive friendships and mentorships outside parental influence
  └─ Integrates:
        • Filters: Replace “I’m only valuable if I follow rules.”
        • Attachment: Develop secure self-attachment
        • Power: Establish autonomy
  │
  ▼
Step 6: Recalibrate Parent-Child Relationship
  ├─ Communicate achievements and mistakes proactively
  ├─ Set respectful boundaries (“I want to try this independently”)
  └─ Celebrate milestones of autonomy
  └─ Integrates:
        • Filters: Reduce guilt about independence
        • Power: Move from control to mutual respect
        • Identity: Affirm personal growth
  │
  ▼
END: Independent, Confident, Resilient, and Skilled in Conflict Resolution


Conclusions

  1. Helicopter parenting shapes children’s behavior in predictable ways:

    • High compliance, low independence, difficulty with conflict resolution, and anxiety.

    • Children often internalize beliefs like “I can’t succeed alone” or “Mistakes are unacceptable.”

  2. Recovery and growth are gradual and intentional:

    • Independence, confidence, and problem-solving skills don’t appear overnight—they require structured steps, reflection, and real-world practice.

  3. Four psychological dimensions are key to change:

    • Attachment style: Understanding it helps children build secure self-reliance.

    • Cognitive filters: Identifying and reframing limiting beliefs reduces fear and self-doubt.

    • Power dynamics: Recognizing control patterns helps reclaim autonomy.

    • Identity shaping: Exploring personal values and goals strengthens self-concept independent of parental expectations.

  4. Balanced parental relationships are achievable:

    • The parent-child relationship can shift from controlling to supportive through clear boundaries, autonomy, and mutual respect.

  5. Experiential learning is essential:

    • Real-life experiences—making decisions, facing failure, resolving conflicts—are the core of building resilience and confidence.

Key Takeaways

  1. Self-Awareness Comes First

    • Understand your attachment style, thought patterns, and how helicopter parenting has shaped you.

  2. Start Small, Scale Gradually

    • Begin with minor decisions, then progressively handle bigger challenges and risks.

  3. Learn from Mistakes

    • Embrace failure as a learning opportunity; resilience grows through trial and error.

  4. Develop Conflict Skills Early

    • Practice assertiveness, negotiation, and boundary-setting in daily interactions.

  5. Redefine Authority and Compliance

    • Question rules thoughtfully, negotiate when appropriate, and assert autonomy respectfully.

  6. Build Identity Outside Parental Expectations

    • Explore passions, form friendships and mentors, and reflect on personal values.

  7. Recalibrate Relationships with Parents

    • Communicate clearly, set boundaries, and demonstrate competence to foster mutual respect.

  8. Consistency is Key

    • Confidence, independence, and conflict-resolution skills grow over time through repeated practice and reflection.

Bottom line:
Children of helicopter parents can break patterns of over-dependence and become confident, independent, and resilient adults. Success depends on self-awareness, gradual risk-taking, skill-building, and reclaiming autonomy, all while reshaping relationships and identity in healthy ways.


Thursday, January 1, 2026

Trauma Bonding, Intermittent Reinforcement, and Psychological Safety: Integrating Health Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience in Trauma Recovery

Sarah Fowler- Graduate Student, PhD in Psychology, Specialization in Health Psychology 

School of Psychology and Community Service 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-fowler-ms-hp-bs-hpb-ba-61272a21/ 

 Abstract

Trauma bonding is a paradoxical attachment that develops between victims and perpetrators in abusive or manipulative relationships, maintained through cycles of abuse and intermittent reinforcement. This paper integrates insights from health psychology, behavioral neuroscience, and trauma research to examine the neurocognitive, psychological, and physiological mechanisms underlying trauma bonds, entrenchment, breadcrumbing, and betrayal. It explores how brain structures, including the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and mesolimbic reward circuits, influence victims’ perception, decision-making, and attachment patterns. Psychological safety is emphasized as a critical component for recovery, while the essay identifies common red flags and outlines evidence-based strategies for intervention. Understanding these interconnected dynamics provides a comprehensive framework for supporting trauma survivors in rebuilding autonomy, trust, and well-being.

Keywords: trauma bonding, intermittent reinforcement, behavioral neuroscience, psychological safety, betrayal, health psychology

Introduction

Trauma bonding represents a paradoxical psychological attachment between victims and perpetrators in abusive, manipulative, or coercive relationships, characterized by cycles of harm interspersed with intermittent affection or validation (Dutton & Painter, 1993). Unlike healthy attachment, trauma bonding is reinforced by fear, guilt, and unpredictable rewards, creating intense dependency despite ongoing harm. Health psychology and behavioral neuroscience provide critical insights into how stress responses, brain structure, and neurochemical pathways contribute to these patterns, illuminating why victims struggle to recognize red flags and disengage from abusive dynamics. This paper examines the interplay between trauma bonding, intermittent reinforcement, entrenchment, breadcrumbing, betrayal, and psychological safety, offering an integrated perspective to support trauma recovery.

Trauma Bonding and Intermittent Reinforcement

Trauma bonding develops through repeated cycles of abuse interspersed with intermittent positive reinforcement, such as sporadic affection or approval, which strengthens attachment (Dutton & Painter, 1993). Intermittent reinforcement engages the brain’s reward system, particularly dopaminergic circuits in the mesolimbic pathway, encoding unpredictable rewards as highly salient and reinforcing compulsive seeking of approval or attention (Koob & Volkow, 2016). Health psychology emphasizes that chronic stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, increasing cortisol levels, impairing executive function, and heightening emotional reactivity (McEwen, 2017). These physiological and cognitive effects contribute to the persistence of trauma bonds, as victims remain emotionally attuned to the abuser’s behavior despite ongoing harm.

Entrenchment, Breadcrumbing, and Neurocognitive Implications

Entrenchment describes the deepening psychological investment in harmful relationships, making victims feel trapped and powerless (Herman, 1997). Breadcrumbing, providing minimal attention or validation to maintain dependence, further entrenches victims by exploiting their desire for connection (Fox & Tang, 2017). Behavioral neuroscience indicates that chronic stress impairs the prefrontal cortex, which governs decision-making, planning, and impulse control, while hyperactivating the amygdala, heightening fear responses and hypervigilance (Arnsten, 2009; LeDoux, 2015). These neurocognitive changes explain why victims may misinterpret abusive behavior, rationalize harm, or struggle to recognize red flags, even when manipulation or betrayal is present.

Betrayal and Psychological Safety

Betrayal is central to trauma dynamics, profoundly undermining psychological safety—the perception that one’s environment and relationships are secure, predictable, and supportive (Edmondson, 1999; Freyd, 1996). Betrayal trauma theory posits that when harm originates from trusted individuals, victims may suppress awareness or dissociate as a protective mechanism, complicating recovery (Freyd, 1996). Brain structures involved in trust, reward, and attachment, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and striatum, are affected by repeated betrayal, altering emotional processing, trust calibration, and decision-making (Rilling & Sanfey, 2011). A compromised sense of psychological safety contributes to entrenchment and perpetuates trauma bonds, highlighting the importance of supportive environments for healing.

Red Flags and Health Psychology Insights

Identifying red flags is crucial for preventing prolonged trauma bonding. Common indicators include:

·         Inconsistent behavior and unpredictable rewards (Dutton, 2003)

·         Gaslighting and distortion of reality (Herman, 1997)

·         Isolation from social support (Carnes, 2013)

·         Subtle attention manipulation, including breadcrumbing (Fox & Tang, 2017)

·         Emotional exploitation and blame-shifting (Freyd, 1996)

Chronic exposure to these stressors increases allostatic load, excitotoxicity ratio,  and the cumulative physiological burden of stress, affecting immune function, cognition, and emotional regulation (Segerstrom & Miller, 2004). Health psychology underscores that awareness of these red flags, combined with education on neurobehavioral mechanisms, is essential for recovery and self-protection.

Recovery Strategies and the Way Forward

Recovery from trauma bonding requires interventions that address both psychological and neurobiological dimensions [Biopsychosocial Model, PNI]. Trauma-informed therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), EMDR, and somatic approaches help victims process abuse, restructure maladaptive thought patterns, and reduce dissociation (Herman, 1997). Mindfulness practices, meditation, and neurofeedback enhance prefrontal regulation, improving decision-making, emotional control, and resilience (Tang et al., 2015). Establishing psychological safety through supportive relationships and predictable environments allows victims to rebuild trust, self-efficacy, and emotional stability (Edmondson, 1999). Education on the neurobehavioral underpinnings of trauma bonding, intermittent reinforcement, and stress responses helps victims contextualize experiences, mitigate self-blame, and strengthen adaptive coping. Collectively, these strategies empower trauma survivors to regain autonomy, reconstruct healthy relationships, and restore both psychological and physiological well-being.

Conclusion

Trauma bonding, intermittent reinforcement, entrenchment, breadcrumbing, and betrayal are multidimensional phenomena shaped by behavioral, psychological, and neurobiological mechanisms. Chronic stress, altered brain function, and compromised psychological safety perpetuate attachment to harmful individuals, making recovery complex. Integrating insights from health psychology and behavioral neuroscience illuminates the pathways through which trauma bonds are formed and maintained, while identifying red flags and evidence-based interventions provides practical strategies for recovery. By addressing cognitive, emotional, social, and neurobiological factors, victims can rebuild autonomy, foster psychological safety, and restore well-being.

References

Arnsten, A. F. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648

Carnes, P. (2013). The betrayed and the betrayer: Understanding trauma bonding. Addiction Press.

Dutton, D. G. (2003). The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. Guilford Press.

Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence and Victims, 8(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.8.2.105

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Fox, J., & Tang, W. Y. (2017). Women’s experiences with breadcrumbing and online dating manipulation. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(4), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-4-5

Freyd, J. J. (1996). Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Harvard University Press.

Herman, J. L. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: A neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8

LeDoux, J. (2015). Anxious: Using the brain to understand and treat fear and anxiety. Viking.

McEwen, B. S. (2017). Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Chronic Stress, 1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2470547017692328

Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647

Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601

Tang, Y. Y., Holzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Bottom of Form